Skip to main content

Disruptions in mobile phones manufacturing

Business as well as life itself is a risk and only those who plunged into the risky terrains mostly at times come out as a leader in innovation with an edge over others.
Mobile phones market has mostly been dominated by big brands like Apple, Samsung, Microsoft (Nokia), Huawei and the likes. At times, the geographical location determines which brand leads where but we all know for now who leads who.

The issue has been disruption in giving the end user what they actually think they want. Putting the power in their palms and helping them toy with it in terms of mobile phones, accessories and mobile apps for different applications to make life easier. All these leads to Internet of Things and innovative smart homes.

I think one day, we will be able to change the colour of our bed sheet with a click of the phone and adjust the thickness of the mattress with the same phone app. (Muse mode). 

In order for tech giants and new manufacturing entrants to achieve this feat, production base has sometimes been moved out of conception area to a location of cheaper labour and fast churn out of products to meet up with demands. 

With competition becoming stiffer and the barriers of manufacturing becoming weakened (though not in the real sense), companies are already developing their own alternatives in chips production just like Apple, Samsung and Huawei to give them chance in putting their own standard functions into their brand of phones and reduce production time. The manufacturing of mobile phones with various disruptions in chipset productions is increasing and a major source concern is, maybe it will fail or succeed.

“When you make your own chips you can design them to be ideal for your specific devices, rather than being designed for all possible use cases,” says mobile analyst Jan Dawson of Jackdaw Research.

Xiaomi is taking the plunge and I learnt it has paid off.

“The key is having full control of the chipset and integration with the phone.”
With that in mind, Xiaomi built the Surge S1, an eight-core, ARM-based processor that, while not exactly a powerhouse, can handle 4K video. More importantly, it’s fully integrated with the new Xiaomi 5C smartphone, which launched with the chip.

Xiaomi’s 5C smartphone, with the company’s new chip inside. 
XIAOMI
Xiaomi reportedly spent $145 million developing the Surge S1 and has already reaped benefits. First and foremost, it allowed Xiaomi to offer a phone right now— the Snapdragon 835 won’t appear until sometime in April with the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S8. Chan says the chip gives the company more control over when it pushes Android updates to customers. 

What of if they had looked at the cost of production and decide it is a hefty risk to take considering the market acceptance and other unforeseeable outcomes that may occur?

Apple’s success with the iPhone and its AX processors underscores how much can go right for companies that invest in developing their own silicon—but also belies how much can go wrong. “Unless you acquire an existing chip maker or designer you’re going to be worse at this than established chip makers,” says Dawson.
That doesn’t just mean potential performance issues, though those are certainly possible. “Imagine if you messed up a chip and you’ve got to do a metal layer spin,” says Moorhead, referring to a step in semiconductor fabrication. “That could mean 90 days added to your schedule.”
Then there’s compatibility, which creates the potential for pitfalls both specific and broad. A brand new chipset could create performance issues for individual apps.
Nevertheless, their step in that direction has put them in the limelight and it is paving way for that brand in the mobile phone market.



Read about the Xiaomi feat from WIRED.COM 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open Source Software

  If you’ve spent any lengthy amount of time on the Internet, you’ve probably heard of open source software but might not have fully understood what it is and why it even exists.   This article will describe this recent phenomenon and describe some of its benefits for the software using community. In a nutshell, open source software is software made by everyone – for everyone. The hope behind its development is that through its open access, it will evolve into something that represents the true desires of computer users. Through a wide network of user involvement, the software in question is enhanced and debugged without costs or administrative policies. Traditionally, software is developed behind closed doors. A team of professional coders build it but the community at large isn’t part of its conception. It’s costly to produce and as you can probably guess, that cost is passed on to the end user: the consumer. Open source software on the other hand is free. Free ...
Computer Security In Today’s Society, Protecting Your Computer Is A Requirement Advancement in computer technology is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it affords us quick and easy access to numerous conveniences such as bank statements, favorite shopping centers, school and health records, and more. On the other hand, it can also grant the same access to those who aren’t supposed to get it. Although it’s a rare occurrence, hacking has become the biggest criminal nuisance in computer history. Make no bones about it. There’s nothing innocent or cute about a hacker. Today’s hackers aren’t the pimply-faced teen rebels that you might be thinking of. Instead, these hackers are grown individuals who are more than likely earning a living by stealing the identities of innocent, law abiding individuals and then selling those identities to others who want to slip by the system. And the only protection against these seedy people is prevention. Computer security couldn’t be m...